Claytonius

Entries categorized as ‘Philosophy of Ministry’

Church Staff Interaction and the Google Ethos

February 21, 2006 · 3 Comments

Google is officially the coolest company ever: TIME: Life in the Googleplex Photo EssayThis makes me want to quit my job and change careers. I wish working at a church could have the fun, creative, imaginative, laid-back feel that Google seems to have. Why are pastors not the creative ones, enjoying coming up with ways to serve people in fresh ways? Why do church programs and planning have the cumbersome feel of huge corporations and not the freshness and life of a place like Google?

When I became a pastor, I had pictured pastoral life as one of creative comradery between theologically-informed, creative, and passionate co-laborers. While I work with great people, many of whom have good ideas, and all of whom are passionate about Jesus and people, it lacks the pop that I had hoped.

I guess my ideal is probably too much to realisticly expect, but what if we aspired to this kind of ethos among church leadership? What if creativity and fun were our style? What if we encouraged fresh thinking and enjoying life? What if we gave the freedom to allow new ideas to flow?

Don’t you have some friends where this mutual spark of creativity and celebration exists? I know I do. C. S. Lewis describes this quality of true friendship as “seeing the same reality” as someone else. I long for this in my work. This is what I wish for in my interaction with fellow pastors. I want creative synergy.

I don’t know if I’m doing a great job describing what I am looking for here. I guess I just want to be exciting to be a minister. Mostly, I find it tedious and…often, if I’m honest…boring. I love interacting with students. I love figuring out ways to teach, but somehow the rest of my job lacks a spark I am looking for. There could be so much creativity in interacting with the culture, developing structures to help people grow, figuring out ways to serve the community, and connecting people in real fellowship.

How can we develop this? How does a large, old evangelical church become this kind of place?

Categories: Philosophy of Ministry · Youth Ministry

Modernizing Hymns

January 5, 2006 · No Comments

This was a good article about hymns and modern updates of hymn lyrics. I agree wholeheartedly with Parrett. I find that people come away with a richer experience when we explain difficult aspects of hymns, rather than change and avoid them. I am thankful for projects like Indelible Grace that assist in preserving and re-contextualizing hymns musically for this era. They allow us to continue to savor the depth of the expresions of worship from the people of God who have gone before us.

One particular point, that I have often harped on, concerns the song “Jesus, Lover of my Soul.” Parrett says what I have often said to my students and people I have lead worship with:

Other types of hymn revisions are even more troubling. Consider the many choruses that have lifted titles or phrases from hymns of earlier days. “Jesus, lover of my soul” has turned up in a number of contemporary songs. In one such song, the worshiper is invited to promise Jesus that “I will never let you go” and “I will worship you until the very end.” The original, written in 1752 by Charles Wesley, could not be more different in emphasis. “Hide me, O my Savior hide, till the storm of life be past” and “Other refuge have I none, hangs my helpless soul on thee” are cries of utter dependence upon God’s faithfulness, not promises of our determined faithfulness to God. (emphasis mine)

Here is the full article: Rasing Ebenezer

Categories: Philosophy of Ministry · Worship

Richard Foster on Renewal in the Church

November 20, 2005 · No Comments

I found an article that was saved on my computer a number of years ago by Richard Foster. He outlined seven steps towards renewal in the Church. I appreciated his thoughts, so I thought I’d post them here:

1. Let’s become intentionally Godward in our orientation. Not self-oriented, not success-oriented, not church-oriented, not seeker-oriented, but God-oriented.2. Let’s stop using a marketing approach to church life. The church is not a vendor of religious goods and services but the Community of Faith, living in faith and through faith and by faith alone. We do not need to mimic the entertainment industry of our culture. We win people to Christ not by entertainment but by the power of the Holy Spirit.

3. We should become intentional about learning the “habits of the heart” for Biblical holiness. We need daily spiritual disciplines rather than sporadic bursts of inspiration or enthusiasm.

4. Let’s quit using the strutting peacock CEO of contemporary culture as a model for Christian leadership.

5. Let’ s make certain that our Godward orientation is always for the sake of the world. The Church exists for the sake of the world, which at the very minimum means less stress on preserving our institutions and more stress on serving the poor.

6. Let’s get rid of our “edifice complex.” Buildings are not bad, but neither are they the sum total of everything important either. Let’s use buildings to help and serve people and not as monuments to our own egos.

7. Let’s engage in vigorous, culture-sensitive evangelism. All peoples need to hear the good news of Jesus and His love.

Categories: Philosophy of Ministry

Full Philosophy of Ministry Paper

November 13, 2005 · No Comments

The following is my philosophy of ministry paper, that I wrote last fall in my History and Philosophy of Christian Education. I posted parts of it previously here on the blog, but this is the full deal. I had hoped to expand and change some parts, which may eventually happen, but for now, I think the full thing is worth posting, only slightly modified.It follows the Frankena model, which is what the Box A, B, C, and D mean. I took out Box E because it no longer describes the ministry context I am actually in.


What is the ultimate purpose of minsitry?
(Box A)

Our understanding of reality begins in the life of the Trinity. God exists in one substance and three persons. There is one God, who exists as the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit.[1] To understand the nature and purpose of all that exists, we must see everything as an overflow of the life of God in the Trinity.

The life of God within the Trinity is one of perfect glory. It is a life of love, with perfect affection of each member to the other two, without malice or apathy, each one always supremely interested in the other. Each member of the Trinity seeks the joy of the other persons of the Trinity, and each member delights in the other members completely. It is a life of shared joy and knowledge. Complete understanding exists between each person of the Godhead, and perfect fellowship characterizes their interaction. All actions of the Trinity are united amongst all three persons, and all seek the same end. It is the perfect community. In the words of the Westminster Confession of Faith, “God hath all life, glory, blessedness, in and of himself.”[2]

Most importantly, each member of the Trinity is glorifying the other two. Each of the members of the Trinity, in seeing the beauty of God in the other two, overflow with joy. The Son and the Spirit delight in the Father. The Spirit and the Father delight in the Son. The Son and the Father honor the Spirit. In a sense, the life of God is the ultimate worship service. Each person of the Trinity praises the perfections of the others, for all recognize the supreme worth of each other. God is supremely happy in all that he sees in himself. As Wayne Grudem puts it, “God delights fully in himself and in all that reflects his character…God is perfectly happy” and “has the fullness of joy in himself.”[3] The life of God is one of infinite happiness. [4]

Out of this life overflow the actions of God outside himself. Not out of deficiency, but out of overflowing sufficiency, God creates the world and acts within it. All of creation is an expression of the joy and glory of the three persons of God from all eternity. God’s desire is to share with other beings the delight that he has in himself, so he creates beings which can participate in the life of God. God has created humans and angels as agents of praise, and placed them in contexts where they can experience the glory of God. In particular, God has placed humans in a world that puts on display his character in various ways, humans themselves as the pinnacle of this display, so that humans will perceive and delight in God’s character. Another way of saying this, is that in creation God is on a mission to form a community of worshipers who will share in his own delight in his glory.

Therefore, the ultimate purpose of reality is to participate in this overflow of the divine life, and to join God in his delight in himself. In other words, “Man’s chief and highest end is to glorify God, and fully to enjoy him forever.”[5] We exist for the display and enjoyment of the glory of God. Like the members of the Trinity, we are to find complete delight in the character and beauty of God. Likewise, our joy is to overflow so that we desire to see more creatures display and enjoy the character of God. To make God famous, to increase the praise he receives, to draw attention to how incredible he is, is the ultimate goal of all existence, and therefore of ministry.

What is the nature of the reality in which the ministry is happening?
(Box B)

The Character of God

Because all reality has its origin in God, in order to understand the nature of reality, we must understand God.

God is a revealing God. In order for his character to delighted in, it must be perceived by his creatures. There is no way for God to be known unless he chooses to make himself known.[6] How does God reveal himself? Most generally, his character is revealed in creation. God has made the natural world to reflect his glory.[7] At the pinnacle of creation are human beings which God created in his image.[8] Through both the natural world and humanity, God has demonstrated his attributes in general. When understood rightly, creation reveals the glory of God. However, for God’s purposes, general revelation is insufficient. For humans to truly know and enjoy God, they must have clear and special revelation. God does this through the Scriptures, which are the Word of God.[9] As a wholly reliable, error-free revelation, they enable humans to know what God is like. God’s ultimate revelation of his character and glory through the Incarnation.[10] In Jesus Christ, God came to dwell among us and to show us what he is like. As Jesus put it, “Whoever sees me sees him who sent me.”[11] All of these modes of revelation are intended to put on display the character of God.

God is a sovereign God. Because God values his glory above all, God has made a plan to insure that his desired end comes about in full. God is in control, ordaining and working all things for his ends.[12] God’s mission is not done is a haphazard way. There is one plan (without a Plan B) which has been put into place from the very beginning. For this reason, we can be confident in God’s promises to bring about our participation in the joy and community of the Trinity.

God is a just God. Because God prizes his glory above all things, he will not tolerate any slander or disrespect of his name. As a result, all who defame his glory through sin are condemned to consequences which fit with the severity of their transgression. Because God’s glory is infinitely worthy, the punishment for defaming it is infinite (i.e. hell).

God is a gracious God. Fortunately for those defame his name, the pinnacle of God’s glory is shown when he gives something that is not deserved.[13] God could rightly punish those who defame his glory, but he desires to show his glory all the more by blessing those who do not deserve to be blessed. How better to show that God is the source of all good things than to give good things to those who clearly do not deserve them? As it says in Ephesians, we have been saved so that we might be “to the praise of his glorious grace, with which he has blessed us in the Beloved”[14] and so that “no one can boast.”[15]

The Nature of Humans

Although the study of the nature of human beings could consume a lifetime, I want to focus on three crucial aspects of humans that factor into how we do ministry.

Humans are culture creating.[16] Unlike most animals, we are not merely driven by biological needs and instincts. Through social interaction, human beings produce customs, rituals, codes of conduct, and modes of interaction. We organize into groups. We produce technology, art, and philosophy. The mandate to create culture was given to humans in Genesis 1:26-28, where God gives human beings dominion over all other living creatures, blesses procreation and the raising of children, commands the subduing of the earth. Ideally, humans are to create and participate in a culture that prizes God’s glory above all.

Humans are finite. This is a significant, but perhaps overlooked, aspect of human nature. Human beings are localized creatures. This means that each individual, and even each community, exists in only one place. All people are spatially, temporally, and culturally located in a specific place. The Bible acknowledges that this localization is determined by God for his own purposes. God has determined the times set for us and the exact places we live.[17] This fact has two important implications. First, isolated humans are only able to manifest incomplete portraits of God’s character. The full expression of God’s glory that God seeks from humans is not possible in isolation, both as individuals and as communities. No one human culture can complete express the fullness of God. Second, the localized nature of humans means that each human community can only influence the cultures which they are immediately connected to. I cannot impact Chinese culture because I am a white man located in the largely white suburbs of Chicago without interact with Chinese culture. I can only impact my local culture.

Humans are sinful. Sin is the pursuit of joy in something other than God’s glory. It is characterized in Jeremiah 2:12-13, which says:

Be appalled, O heavens, at this; be shocked, be utterly desolate, declares the Lord, for my people have committed two evils: they have forsaken me, the fountain of living waters, and hewed out cisterns for themselves, broken cisterns that can hold no water.

Sin is when we seek to be satisfied, not in the living water flowing from the heart of God, but in the putrid, stagnant, and insufficient sources of pleasure that fill the world.[18] By delighting inordinately in something other than God, we sin and defame the glory of God’s sufficiency. By abandoning the glory of God as our source of delight, there are two results. The first consequence is that we incur the wrath of God for defaming his glory.[19] Second, it makes us less than human by distorting the purpose for which we exist. Our world is warped, and all the ideal relationships and functions of our life are bent and marred.

Adam and Eve, our first parents, sinned, and humans have lived a warped life under wrath ever since. Through our union with Adam, we have joined him in his sin.[20] Our current state is one of inherited sinfulness and guilt. All who have been born after Adam have been born in a state of total depravity. We are unable to seek good as it should be.[21] All our actions are tainted with sin. Without exception, human beings are born on a collision course with a failed life and a doomed eternity.[22]

Salvation

“Thanks be to God through our Lord Jesus Christ our Lord!”[23] Because of God’s desire to show the glory as the all-sufficient source of every good, God has provided a way from humans to escape his wrath and to be restored to the purpose for which they were created. This was accomplished in Jesus Christ.

Through Jesus Christ alone, atonement for sin is accomplished. In the incarnation, the Second person of the Trinity united himself with humanity by taking on a human nature.[24] As the head of the new humanity, Jesus lived a life of perfect obedience and submission to the purposes of God, truly living the human life as it was meant to be lived.[25] Although his life had earned no wrath from God, Jesus stood in solidarity with his people and bore the wrath of God which they deserved.[26] In doing so, God’s wrath against them was satisfied.[27] When Jesus suffered and died on the cross, he made the sacrifice for sin once and for all, for all those who trust him.[28]

However, only those who trust in Jesus are saved. Unfortunately, because human beings are thoroughly bent on pursuing their own pleasure, they will not turn to Christ in faith. For someone to trust to God is a miracle worked by the Spirit at the command of the Father. As Jesus says, “No one can come to me unless the Father who sent me draws him.”[29] Likewise, because God is sovereign, this is a work that God never fails to accomplish. Jesus also says, “All that the Father gives me will come to me, and whoever comes to me I will never cast out.”[30] Without the work of God, no one comes to faith in Jesus. This is so that “it depends not on human will or exertion, but on God, who has mercy.”[31] In this way, God’s grace is on display most fully. God gets all the credit, and no human being can boast that he earned his salvation.[32]

It is important to see that salvation includes not only justification, but also the transformation of all life. By Jesus’ death, our relationships are healed, and we are reconciled with our fellow humans.[33] Because of God’s gift, we will experience the glorification of our bodies and take part in the new heavens and new earth. In the present, our character is being transformed by the work of the Spirit. Through the Spirit we are being shaped to be like Jesus, the true human.[34] Likewise, through the Spirit, we have restored communion with God and the ability to share in the delight of the glory of the Trinity as we were designed to do. Through the Spirit, all believers have access to God as priests, requiring no mediators other than Jesus.[35]

Our salvation is not isolated or individualistic. God has placed us in a society of redeemed humans, the Church. Because we express God’s glory only partially as individuals, he has placed us together so we can express it more completely. We are to be “a chosen race, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, a people for his own possession.”[36] The Church joins with God in his mission of displaying the glory of God. We exist to “proclaim the excellencies of him who called you out of darkness into his marvelous light.”[37] The Church is God’s missional community, his agents of reconciliation who are seeking people who worship in spirit and truth[38] and making disciples of all nations.[39]

Epistemology

Human beings perceive and understand reality by use of both their reason and affections, their head and heart, their rationality and emotions.[40] In the past, Christian theology has sometimes erred by emphasizing the rational aspect of understanding over the emotional. At other times, (including much of popular culture today), the emotional aspect of understanding has been overdone. True understanding comes when one grasps properly with the mind and responds properly with the heart.

In considering how we gain understanding, there are at least three issues that must be taken into account. First, humans are relational creatures that are inextricably situated in a context. The society and culture we are in, our families, and our prior assumptions all impact our reception of knowledge and our response to it. We understand things in the constructs we have in place at the time of learning, and our constructs change only gradually. Second, humans are experiential creatures. We do not exist merely as minds and emotions. You cannot impact our understanding directly, but must do so through means of our senses. We hear, smell, see, feel, and taste. We learn through encounter and interaction. Third, and most importantly, we are sinful creatures. Sin has affected our capacity to understand. We are no longer capable of true understanding that is untainted. Both our mind and our emotions have been tainted, and neither is wholly reliable.

Current Culture

Because we are contextualized, culture-creating creatures, we must have an understanding of current culture in which ministry will take place. Like all the other categories discussed above, this would take books and books to describe. However, several important realities must be considered for ministry.

First, our society is post-Christian.[41] Although most of the Western world was predominantly influenced by Christianity for the past fifteen hundred years, people no longer see their world through the general grid of theism and Judeo-Christian morality. Categories that were understood by past generations (including words like sin, salvation, grace, and other important Christian words) are no longer meaningful to people in our culture. The story that people use to interpret the world is not one of fall and redemption any more.

Second, we live in a transitional age between modernism and postmodernism.[42] Leaving the rationalistic mindset of the Enlightenment and the idealistic hope of scientific progress, our society has embraced a pluralistic pessimism. Rejecting objective metanarratives, postmodern society teems with relativism and tribalism.

Third, partly because of, or at least in accord with, postmodernism, our society has embraced extreme egalitarianism. Western society place hide value on equality. From equality between races and genders to equality of religions and lifestyles, our society refuses to place too strong of distinctions or value judgments on anything for fear of destroying equality.

Fourth, and related to this, is a deep seated bent towards individualism.[43] We value the freedom of the individual to an extreme level. From a young age, Americans are told that what other people think or do has no bearing on them. They are their own person, free to break tradition and do their own thing.

Fifth, our culture is bloated with consumerism. Entertainment and consumption are the hallmarks of our wealthy American society. From food, to media, to acquiring property, our culture screams at us to take an excessive amount of anything for ourselves.

Finally, our culture is shaped by globalism and multiculturalism. Unlike any time in all of history, the average person has a good knowledge of the fact that the world is filled with people who are mostly different from them. Information about other parts of the world is instant, and appreciative encounters with other cultures is an expected part of a full life. This is fed by the internet and media, and likewise feeds the postmodern mood of pluralism.

It is in this historically unique culture in which we must do ministry today, and we are all affected by it, whether we like it or not.

What qualities ought to be culivated in people as a result of your ministry?
(Box C)

The fundamental medium through which humans glorify God is culture. Our purpose is to create a culture that displays and delights in the character of God. [44] The fact that humans glorify God through culture is very important to understand. There are many who understand that humans were created for God’s glory, but often this is pictured in vague, immaterial terms. To glorify God is often removed from the context of life in a way that makes it something you can only do in a church service or merely a token acknowledgement of credit being given to God.[45] Glorifying God should be fleshed out expressions of culture. Patterns of life, relationships, artistic expression, work, sex, politics, and economics are all a part of the culture that God seeks to be glorified in. They are not merely incidentals, but the very place where God’s character is displayed and delighted in. To seek the glory of God is not to endure the things of this life for the sake of getting to the eternal worship service in the sky. We are created glorify God in culture.

I would propose that the goal of ministry is to cultivate a certain type of culture that glorifies God. Before I describe the trains of such I culture, I want to make three clarifications about the form this culture must take.[46]

First of all, it must be a public culture. This means living out in the open, where the world can see. Our culture must not be ghettoized in safe little bubbles. It must actively involved in the world at large. This is both the nature of cultures, but also a result of the mission orientation of the culture we seek to create. Because we seek to display God’s character to the world, we cannot withdraw from the world.

Second, it must be a counter-culture, not a subculture. By this distinction, I want to prevent a form of Christian culture that merely mimics the dominant culture that surrounds it. Contemporary forms of Christian culture tend to be parasitic, sucking off the creativity of the broader pop culture and expressing it with nicer, safer, more pleasant content. Instead of dropping Christian content into an existing culture, I recommend active creativity on the part of Christians. We must still interact, react to, and learn from the broader culture, but we must not parrot it.

Third, our culture must be a local culture. This goes back to the fact that human beings are finite and localized creatures. Because we can only interact with those we are in contact with, each local fellowship of believers must focus on the community around them. This does not exclude foreign and cross-cultural missions, but instead requires that the goal of foreign missions be to establish local fellowships that can minister to and reach their community.[47] This means that each expression of Christian culture will be shaped by local realities.

With that being said, what does this God-glorifying culture look like? How do people in it act? What are the excellencies that we ought to see in people that make up the culture? What are the values of such a culture?

To begin with, people must have right-standing before God. The guilt of sin must be overcome before a God-glorifying culture can be created. Our first goal in ministry, then, is to seek people’s justification. In the words of Spurgeon, “Soul-winning is the chief business of the Christian minister; indeed it should be the main pursuit of every true believer.”[48] This means that we must seek to cultivate trust in the grace of God in all those that we minister to. The abandonment of self-reliance and turning to Christ for salvation is the fundamental trait of those in a God-glorifying culture. When we are completely reliant on the grace of God, we put on display the glory of his all-sufficiency and sheer kindness. Once people are justified, they can begin participating in a culture that displays and delights in the character of God.

A God-glorifying culture is characterized by theological living. If we would share in the delight of God in his glory, we must understand his glory. We must perceive his attributes in order to delight in them. This means deep thinking, wrestling with ideas, abandonment of simplistic answers, and willingness to exert mental energy. Because this is a culture of theological living, all members of the culture ought to take part in theology, not an elite few. This does not mean that all must be academic theologians, but all must be practical theologians. If a Christian is a lawyer, they must engage in deep thinking about how the nature of God impacts law. If a Christian is a cook, they must think hard about how theology impacts the culinary arts.[49] The same goes for construction workers, ranchers, politicians, farmers, textile manufactures, IRS agents, soldiers, astronomers, musicians and every kind of person who participates in the God-glorifying culture.[50]

We must cultivate a culture marked by worshipful living. Worship is the act of enjoying the glory of God. Having perceived the display of God’s character, God’s people respond to God’s character just like the members of the Trinity do, with delight. We join in God’s delight in God. This means wonder, awe, amazement, and passion. It is about being consumed with emotion over the beauty of God.

Members of a God-glorifying culture would be characterized by missional living.[51] Just like God, the Church’s joy will overflow into active work to extend this joy to others. We must join in the mission of God to pursue worshipers, make disciples, and transform both people and societies. This culture must be a growing, spreading culture, not a stagnant one. In a sense, Christians must view all life as a mission trip. All members of the Christian community must be active in the mission of God.

Reflecting the life of the Trinity, a God-glorifying culture is characterized by communal living.[52] By this, I do not mean living in a commune (although that is not excluded, I suppose). However, a God-glorifying culture is one that is shared. The harmony of people with each other is a reflection of the character of God. [53] This goes beyond gathering once a week to sing to God and hear a lecture from the Bible. This means actually sharing life. Just like in the book of Acts, as the Church we must share the ins and outs of every day life, from our spiritual life to our physical needs to our work. Our life is one done together.

Because we are truly seeking to create a culture, we must be characterized by creative living.[54] God is a creator, expressing in an infinite variety of ways the many facets of his glory. He calls us to share in his delight and expression of his glory, should we not also be creative? The people of God should be known as poets, painters, writers, dancers, musicians, and actors. The glory of God is so vast that we should never run out of aspects of his character to express or ways to express them in a new way. Drab, dull, and boring should not be traits of Christian culture.

Because we seek to create a culture that makes God’s glory the supreme value, we will be characterized by sacrificial living.[55] Like our head, Jesus, as a culture, we must prize the fame of God above all lesser goods. To see God praised, we will be willing (and bold) to give up comfort, safety, and even our lives. When your joy is in the unchanging character of God, nothing can stop you, not even suffering or persecution.

Reflecting the character of God, we must create a culture that is characterized by just living. Social justice and compassion should be championed by Christians. Love for the underprivileged and the powerless flow from the heart of God, and it ought to characterized those who would display God’s character to the world. This means acts of mercy and compassion towards those in need, but it also means the formation of just structures of society.[56] The likelihood is that this will upset the status quo of many existing societies and Christian fellowships.

What methods should we use to bring about those qualities?
(Box D)

The first, last, and most important method in ministry is prayer. Because salvation is all of God, because humans are totally sinful, because spiritual forces challenge our ministry, and because ministers themselves are plagued with weaknesses we need God. We must plead for souls. We must throw ourselves on his grace. We must turn to him in trust. We must pray. If you ministry can be explained by anything other than the supernatural, something is wrong.

A natural place to begin thinking about ministry methods is to ask: who does the ministry? Because all members of the Church have access to God, all members of the Christian community ought to participate in ministry.[57] We seek to cultivate a shared lifestyle, and sharing ministry is part of that. All members of the body are involved in the mission of God, so all members contribute. There are specific members of the community, however, that should be held responsible to see that ministry is happening. The first are heads of households.[58] Another way of saying this is saying that every Dad is a Pastor to his family. Like the Puritans, I believe that each family should be seen as a primary locus of spiritual growth. Extending on that idea, I believe that Fathers should be coordinating their family as a missional unit. As a community on a mission, we already have built in structure for local and global ourtreach. Second, the elders are the spiritual leaders of the local community. A plurality of leaders that are a part of the community, as opposed to a hired staff with a head pastor, who actually facilitate the ministry is crucial. The elders, based on their gifts[59], ought to share ministry responsibilities amongst them. Rotating who speaks and who leads worship gatherings, for example, may be a good idea.

The process of forming disciples must include spiritual disciplines.[60] Both corporately and privately, the disciplines should be a common means to forming the members of a local community. Prayer, fasting, silence, solitude, pilgrimages, giving, and celebration should be regular parts of the life of the Church. Because people are formed by what they do and experience, both the character of individuals and the culture of a community can be shaped by the disciplines. They are an ancient form of experiential learning that we ought to claim today.

To cultivate theological living, we must engage in teaching and preaching.[61] People must understand what God is like and what he is doing in order to reflect his glory. The sermon is the main way the content of the faith is imparted to the community. However, we must keep in mind the realities that humans are experiential and holistic beings. We cannot preach with words alone. We are free to be creative in how we teach and express. Props, interaction from the congregation, discussion, movement, artistic representation, and other modes of communication and learning must be employed. A talking head at the front of a sanctuary is not the picture we need to have. A dancing, moving, laughing, questioning whirlwind is more like it. This does not mean more shallow or less Biblical teaching, in fact it requires as much or more processing of the truth about God to express it in more ways than the verbal. Preaching has gotten into a box sometimes. Preaching needs to be unleashed.

Worship services are central in forming a culture that displays and delights in the glory of God. Corporate activity shapes people, their identity, their shared memories, their values. This is where people encounter and express in the most direct ways, the character of God. If people are to live worshipfully and theologically, they will learn to do it at gatherings of the people of God to worship. Because we seek to express the character of God, God’s revelation must be the center of our worship service. Christ and the Scriptures should be our focus in every worship service. Because we learn through senses and experience and we want to be a creative culture, we must allow our worship to be creative.[62] Music, art, movement, corporate prayer, discussion, sensory experiences, visuals, and even food ought to be a part of our worship. Of course, God himself has given us the best experiential expressions of his character in the sacraments. We ought to share Communion regularly,[63] and baptisms ought to be in the regular worship service.[64]

Elders and church leaders ought to be cultural influencers of their local fellowship, and the one of the best ways they can do this is through the creative use of traditions. Whether you take up a tradition of the ancient church, your denomination, or develop new ones for your own community, traditions are crucial to culture formation. They are the markers that remind people what their lives are about. As traditions are repeated, people are shaped.

To encourage missional living, we need to coordinate local service and outreach.[65] People need to know that being the Church isn’t something you do inside a church building. It is something you do in the world. Working among the local poor, coordinating with local organizations, working alongside your town government, all of these are aspects of being a missionally involved local culture. Our outreach must be outside of the church, not an event where we expect people to come into our church building to hear the Gospel. We must be publicly and locally involved in our community. That is how we will see the God-glorifying culture spread and people come to faith in Christ. This is something that all regular members of a local church should be expected to be a part of. Not only will this be an outlet fro missional living, but it also encourages community in powerful ways when people serve together.

Small groups are a great way to encourage all sorts of our educational goals.[66] They can be used to facilitate communal living. They can be organizing units for missional activity. They often result in people coming to Christ, because they feel comfortable in a small group, but not a worship service. This is where spiritual disciplines can happen, as well as theological processing. If we want people to think theologically about their lifestyle, this is where they can wrestle with their ideas of how that can be done.

One of the hallmark of the early church that we need to embrace wholeheartedly is shared meals.[67] You want to talk about a powerful cultural force? Food is huge. Who you eat with, how the food is served and prepared, where you eat it, all this shapes culture in more ways than we notice. Communal living is most quickly facilitated through meals. We should eat at worship services, have feasts, and host potlucks. I would love to have a church where it was natural for people to simply prepare and bring food just because that is what you do at church, eat.[68]

Finally, if we are a culture that celebrates the glory of God, enjoying it, not mere acknowledging it, we need have lots of parties. Why do people think Christian culture is boring? They shouldn’t. We should be known for feasts and festivals, just like the Jews.[69] I am talking about music, food, dancing, laughter, and games. We are the community of the redeemed people of God, those who are invited to take part in the joy of the Trinity, and people think we’re dull! I think it’s a sin if we perpetuate that error. Let my people party!

Bibliography

Baxter, Richard. The Reformed Pastor. Carlisle, PA: Banner of Truth Trust, 1999.

Bonhoeffer, Dietrich. Life Together. New York: Harper & Row, 1954.

Clapp, Rodney. A Peculiar People. Downers Grove, IL: Intervarsity, 1996.

Dillenberger, John, ed. Martin Luther: Selections From His Writings. Garden City, NY:

Doubleday, 1961.

Driscoll, Mark. Radical Reformission. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2004.

____. Mars Hill Church Website. http://www.marshillchurch.org. Internet; Accessed 16

December 2004.

Foster, Richard J. Celebration of Discipline. San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1978.

Grenz, Stanley. A Primer on Postmodernism. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1996.

Guder, Darrell L., ed. Missional Church: A Vision for the Sending of the Church in North America. Grand Rapids: Eerdmanns, 1998.

Grudem, Wayne. Systematic Theology. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 1994.ste

Kimball, Dan. The Emerging Church. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2003.

Kimball, Dan. Emerging Worship. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2003.

Ortberg, John. The Life You’ve Always Wanted. Grand Rapids: Zondervan 1997.

Piper, John. Desiring God. Sisters, Oregon: Multnomah 1996.

____. The Pleasures of God. Sisters, Oregon: Multnomah 2000.

____. The Supremacy of God in Preaching. Grand Rapids: Baker 1990.

____. God’s Passion for His Glory. Wheaton, IL: Crossway, 1998.

Rusaw, Rick and Eric Swanson. The Externally Focused Church. Loveland, CO: Group,

2004.

Smith, John E., Stout, Harry S., and Minkema, Kenneth. A Jonathan Edwards Reader.

New Haven: Yale 1995.

Spurgeon, Charles H. The Soul Winner. Fearn, Ross-shire, Scotland: Christian Focus,

1998.

Wesley, John. The Works of John Wesley. Grand Rapids: Baker 1978.

“The Westminster Larger Catechism,” http://www.reformed.org/documents/larger1.html;

Internet; accessed 15 December 2004.


[1] See Wayne Grudem, “God in Three Persons” and “The Athanasian Creed,” Systematic Theology (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 1994), 226-261, 1170-1.
[2] Ibid., “Westminster Confession of Faith,”1180.
[3] Ibid., 218.
[4] For an in depth discussion of this, see John Piper, The Pleasures of God (Sisters, OR: Multnomah, 2000). A more challenging treatment of this same topic is Jonathan Edward’s The End for Which God Created the World. An excellent annotated version of this is available in John Piper, God’s Passion for His Glory (Wheaton, IL: Crossway, 1998). Piper’s footnotes make Edward’s work much more readable.
[5] “The Westminster Larger Catechism,” available from http://www.reformed.org/documents/larger1.html; Internet; accessed 15 December 2004.
[6] Matthew 11:27, Luke 10:22, Isaiah 55:8-9
[7] Psalm 19:1-3, 97:6, Romans 1:20
[8] Genesis 1:26
[9] II Timothy 3:15-17, John 5:19
[10] John 1:14, Colossians 1:9, Hebrews 1:1-2
[11] John 12:45 (ESV)
[12] Romans 8:28, Ephesians 1:11
[13] My idea that grace is the pinnacle of God’s glory is from John Piper. It can be found throughout his writings. In particular, see John Piper, “Was Jonathan Edwards a Christian Hedonist?” available at http://www.desiringgod.org/library/topics/christian_hedonism/edwards.html; accessed 16 December 2004.
[14] Ephesians 1:6 (ESV)
[15] Ephesians 2:9
[16] See Elizabeth Conde-Frazier, S. Steve Kang, and Gary A. Parrett, A Many Colored Kingdom (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic 2004), 52.
[17] Acts 17:26
[18] See John Piper, Desiring God (Sisters, Oregon: Multnomah 1996). Also, C. S. Lewis, Weight of Glory (San Francisco: HarperSanFrancisco 2001).
[19] Romans 3:23
[20] Romans 5:12ff
[21] Romans 3:10-12
[22] Romans 3:9, Psalm 51:5
[23] Romans 7:25
[24] John 1:14
[25] Romans 5:12-21
[26] II Corinthians 5:21
[27] Romans 3:25
[28] Hebrews 10:11-18
[29] John 6:44, 6:65
[30] John 6:37
[31] Romans 9:16
[32] Ephesians 2:9
[33] Ephesians 2:14
[34] Romans 8:29
[35] Romans 8:26-27, Hebrews 4:14-16
[36] I Peter 2:9
[37] Ibid.
[38] John 4:23
[39] Matthew 28:18-20
[40] I follow the lead of many great theologians in the past in acknowledging the importance of both of these aspects of human understanding. Specifically Charles Spurgeon and Jonathan Edwards. See Jonathan Edwards, “A Treatise Concerning Religious Affections available in A Jonathan Edwards Reader (New Haven: Yale 1995),137-171.
[41] See Rodney Clapp, A Peculiar People (Downers Grove, IL: Intervarsity 1996).
[42] For an excellent treatment of postmodernism, see Stanley Grenz. A Primer on Postmodernism.(Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans 1996)
[43] This is pervasively true, although some strains of postmodernism are moving people toward a more tribal and communal view of the world.
[44] For more on the idea of the Church as a culture see Rodney Clapp, A Peculiar People (Downers Grove, IL: Intervarsity 1996). Also see Mark Driscoll, Radical Reformission (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan 2004).
[45] The first results in extreme piety, and a withdrawal from the world. Such Christians often have no impact on the world around them. A common example of this is the “youth-group-is-my-life kid.” A more extreme example of this is the medieval monastics who withdrew from society. The other is often merely an anemic statement given so that people can get on with the business of living, having, of course, given token credit to God. Such Christians often look practically no different from non-Christians in how they operate everywhere outside of personal devotions and church services. Faith is a matter of private practice and opinion, not public action. An extreme picture of this is the typical professional athlete that thanks Jesus after winning a game.
[46] For more on the interaction between the Church and mainstream culture see Mark Driscoll Radical Reformission.
[47] See Rick Rusaw and Eric Swanson, The Externally Focused Church. (Loveland, CO: Group 2004).
[48] Charles Spurgeon, Soul Winner (Fearn, Ross-shire, Scotland: Christian Focus 1998), 5.
[49] Far fetched? Over stating it? 1 Cor. 10:31 does say, “So, whether you eat or drink, or whatever you do, do all to the glory of God.” Again, this does not mean the token acknowledgement of credit being given God while we get on with doing the same old thing. It requires wrestling with the implications of the character of God with every aspect of life.
[50] There are (with a little poetic license) examples of all of believers in God who had all these jobs in the Bible.
[51] See Darrell L. Guder, ed. Missional Church: A Vision for the Sending of the Church in North America. (Grand Rapids: Eerdmanns 1998). Also see Dan Kimball, The Emerging Church. (Grand Rapids: Zondervan 2003).
[52] For more on community see Dietrich Bonhoeffer, Life Together (New York: Harper & Row 1954).
[53] John 17:20-23
[54] See Dan Kimball, Emerging Church, 143-154.
[55] See John Piper “Suffering: The Sacrifice of Christian Hedonism” in Desiring God, 212-238. This chapter changed my life.
[56] Examples of both of these can be seen in the book of Acts, where it is said that the Christians provided for people as need arose, but they also participated in economic restructuring so that some communities held their goods in common. See both Acts 2:45 and Acts 4:32.
[57] See Martin Luther, John Dillenberger, ed. “An Appeal to the Ruling Class of German Nationality as to the Amelioration of the State of Christendom.” Available in Martin Luther: Selections From His Writings. (Garden City, NY: Doubleday 1961), 407-414.
[58] As implied in Richard Baxter, The Reformed Pastor. (Carlisle, PA: Banner of Truth Trust 1999). Hear also Mark Driscoll, “Men as Fathers” available at http://www.marshillchurch.org/audio/11.11.01_11am_men_as_fathers_driscoll.mp3. accessed 16 December 2004.
[59] Which should included the ability to teach. I Timothy 3:2
[60] See John Ortberg, The Life You’ve Always Wanted. (Grand Rapids: Zondervan 1997). See also Richard J. Foster, Celebration of Discipline. (San Francisco: Harper & Row 1978). See also Dan Kimball, The Emerging Church, 213-225.
[61] See Dan Kimball, The Emerging Church, 171-196. See also John Piper, The Supremacy of God in Preaching. (Grand Rapids: Baker 1990).
[62] See Dan Kimball, Emerging Worship (Grand Rapids: Zondervan 2004).
[63] I prefer every week, myself.
[64] Many churches do baptisms in a separate, less well attended service at another time in the week. I think this is a mistake, seeing as baptism is a rite of entry into a community, and the community is not always there to see it.
[65] See Rick Rusaw and Eric Swanson, The Externally Focused Church.
[66] See John Wesley, “A Plain Account of the People Called Methodists” in The Works of John Wesley, 3rd Ed., Vol. VIII. (Grand Rapids: Baker 1978), 249-268.
[67] Acts 2:46
[68] Think of how food impacts the dynamic of a school classroom. When someone brings food, it can bring a whole group together and open people up in remarkable ways. And when it is students who bring the food, it makes them feel a connection to that class in a positive way.
[69] God had assigned at least three mandatory feasts every year for the people of Israel. One of the tithes was exclusively given for a week long celebration in Jerusalem. See the book of Leviticus.

Categories: Mission · Philosophy of Ministry · Theology

CT Interview with Eugene Peterson

April 2, 2005 · No Comments

I was deeply challenged and inspired and moved by this interview with Eugene Peterson in CT last month. I wish I had the vision of spirituality that Peterson does perpetually in my mind. Far too often I am dominated by the program/method/technique mentality, and I miss the depth and reality. I think I’m going to get his new book. I suggest you check out the interview and let it challenge you.

Categories: Philosophy of Ministry

How Demographic-Driven Ministry Drives People Away from Church

March 31, 2005 · 1 Comment

Now, I certainly would not advocate abandoning the church, but this post broke my heart and I could understand why someone would leave and not return: A Church-Free Easter by Jesus Outside the Box. There is also an interesting post here on the same site about why someone would not want to be a part of the church as it is now.

A stream of questions comes to mind, not all of which are directly related to the above posts, but are inspired by them:

How do our demographic-targeted approaches hinder the formation of a true Christian community? Is there is a way to minister to people without dividing them into classifications and seperating them from others? What are we teaching implicitly when we do this? Obviously, there is a nature tendency in people to homogenety, but how do we fight that in order to allow for diversity of lifestyle and life situation when it does creep into communities? How do we encourage diversity and make a space for it? How do we minister to the large segments of our community (i.e. married people, parents, etc.) without making the smaller segments feel unwelcome or second-class? The way Jesus did things favored those who were powerless, minority, isolated, lonely, and not the biggest players on the field. How do we do that? How do we make sure that we have diversity enough that we can learn from each other instead of having a group of people who are all the same telling each other things they already know and believe? How can be challenged by a 60-year old widow if I don’t have a chance to know her? How can a hispanic teenager help me understand God from his perspective if I don’t know any hispanic teenagers (even if there are plenty in our church’s hispanic ministry)? How do we offer ministries that are relevant to the groups we have in our church without isolating people who don’t fall neatly into those groups?

What does it take for us to be sensitive to those who have pain and hurt? I know that when you meet someone new on Sunday, you aren’t ready for a emotion-gushing-pour-out-my-soul conversation, but how do we facilitate a community where people can develop the kind of safety where they can be honest about what is really going on? Even with people who aren’t deeply wounded, but just in a different situation in life, how do we not isolate them? People are longing for vulnerability, and the Church should be able to handle that, by why don’t we do a good job?

Categories: Philosophy of Ministry

The Ultimate Purpose of Ministry (Box A)

March 28, 2005 · 1 Comment

The Triune Life of God

Our understanding of reality begins in the life of the Trinity. God exists in one substance and three persons. There is one God, who exists as the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit.1 To understand the nature and purpose of all that exists, we must see everything as an overflow of the life of God in the Trinity.

The life of God within the Trinity is one of perfect glory. It is a life of love, with perfect affection of each member to the other two, without malice or apathy, each one always supremely interested in the other. Each member of the Trinity seeks the joy of the other persons of the Trinity, and each member delights in the other members completely. It is a life of shared joy and knowledge. Complete understanding exists between each person of the Godhead, and perfect fellowship characterizes their interaction. All actions of the Trinity are united amongst all three persons, and all seek the same end. It is the perfect community. In the words of the Westminster Confession of Faith, “God hath all life, glory, blessedness, in and of himself.”2

Most importantly, each member of the Trinity is glorifying the other two. Each of the members of the Trinity, in seeing the beauty of God in the other two, overflow with joy. The Son and the Spirit delight in the Father. The Spirit and the Father delight in the Son. The Son and the Father honor the Spirit. In a sense, the life of God is the ultimate worship service. Each person of the Trinity praises the perfections of the others, for all recognize the supreme worth of each other. God is supremely happy in all that he sees in himself. As Wayne Grudem puts it, “God delights fully in himself and in all that reflects his character…God is perfectly happy” and “has the fullness of joy in himself.”3 The life of God is one of infinite happiness.4

The Ultimate Purpose: The Overflow of God’s Life in the World

Out of this life overflow the actions of God outside himself. Not out of deficiency, but out of overflowing sufficiency, God creates the world and acts within it. All of creation is an expression of the joy and glory of the three persons of God from all eternity. God’s desire is to share with other beings the delight that he has in himself, so he creates beings which can participate in the life of God. God has created humans and angels as agents of praise, and placed them in contexts where they can experience the glory of God. In particular, God has placed humans in a world that puts on display his character in various ways, humans themselves as the pinnacle of this display, so that humans will perceive and delight in God’s character. Another way of saying this, is that in creation God is on a mission to form a community of worshipers who will share in his own delight in his glory.

Therefore, the ultimate purpose of reality is to participate in this overflow of the divine life, and to join God in his delight in himself. In other words, “Man’s chief and highest end is to glorify God, and fully to enjoy him forever.”5 We exist for the display and enjoyment of the glory of God. Like the members of the Trinity, we are to find complete delight in the character and beauty of God. Likewise, our joy is to overflow so that we desire to see more creatures display and enjoy the character of God. To make God famous, to increase the praise he receives, to draw attention to how incredible he is, is the ultimate goal of all existence, and therefore of ministry.

Objections, Cautions, and Considerations

This is not an easily accepted reality for most people. It is counterintuitive, often not presented well, easy to misunderstand, and not very appealing to our sinful sides. We don’t quickly love the idea that God’s glory is the ultimate purpose of reality. Here are some considerations for how best to understand this idea:

Have a good definition of glory. - A more tangible picture of what this means will be fleshed out in later sections of this philosophy of ministry, but it is important right at the outset to have a strong definition of “glory,” because it is a frequently misunderstood word. Glory as two aspects to it. The first is display, and the second is delight. Something is glorified when it is shown off, put in a place where many people can see it, or when it has attention drawn to it. Something amazing and wonderful and praiseworthy does not have glory if it is kept a total secret. Great actors only have glory because people know them. Rock stars have glory because people have heard their music. Glory only happens when something is expressed, recognized, and noticed. However, merely being on display does not mean glory. Glory aslo requires delight. By delight I mean approval or praise. A well-know criminal does not have glory. A tyrant does not have glory. No matter how well known someone is, unless the attention they have gotten is positive, it is not glory. Motzart, Davinci, and Picasso have glory, because everyone thinks they are great. The Hindenburg, the Edsel, and Milli Vanilli do not have glory because we only know about them because they failed. Therefore, it is helpful to think of the ultimate purpose of all things, not as the glory of God, but the display of God’s character for the purpose of delight. The actual mode of display is also important, but will be discussed in detail in later sections of this paper.

Keep it the Context of the Trinity. - Very often, especially in some classic Reformed expressions, this doctrine comes across as making God selfish or unloving. The picture that is painted seems more like an egotistical diety looking in a mirror constantly. It is not a very appealing picture of God to many people. That is why it is important to put God’s passion for his glory in the context of the Trinity. Each member of the Trinity is not looking at himself, but rather the others with delight. It is a picture of a community, rather than a lone monomaniac. I appreciate what Stanley Grenz says about this subject:

God’s glory is indeed the final goal of all God’s actions. But in order to make sense out of this assertion, we must understand it in its proper context. In our reflection on the divine purpose we ought not to think of God as a solitary subject…Rather, we must approach this theme from the perspective of God as triune…The inner dynamic of the triune God is love–the relationship shared between Father and Son which is the Holy Spirit. We have likewise noted that God’s intention in history is an outworking of his own eternal nature. His goal for humankind is that we be the image of God, that is, the reflection of the very nature of the Creator. But the Creator is none other than the triune God–Father, Son, and Holy Spirit–the divinely corporate; God intends to bring to pass a reconciled creation in which humans reflect in relationship to each other and to the universe around us the reality of the triune Creator. Hence, God’s actions are aimed at establishing the reconciled community of love as the human reflection of the social Trinity–the divine nature–which is love.

In this manner, God’s soteriological purposes arise out of the glorification of his own triune nature. By establishing the eschatological community of love, the covenant people, God brings into being a new humankind, a people who mirror for all creation the divine character and essence. As his essential nature is made manifest in creation, the triune God is glorified. Rather than a cosmic egoist who demands the opposite quality in his creatures, therefore, he is the triune God who desires that humans mirror his own holy character which is love. As we live in fellowship, we bring honor to the One who is himself the divine community of love.6

Ask what you would propose as an alternative - What is it that is worthy of taking the central place in God’s affections? What is worthy for God to consider the most beautiful, amazing, praiseworthy, and delightful thing in existence? What is there that you would propse that would work other than God? Yourself? Humanity? The World? Some would like to propose that the ultimate purpose of God in the world is bringing about salvation for individuals. Others would say the salvation of the church. Others would say either the Kingdom of God or the New Creation are the ultimate goal of God’s activity.

My response to those proposals comes from two direcions. The first is to say that these are subordinate ends of God. God is certainly interested in the salvation of individuals, the formation and salvation of the Church, the Kingdom, and New Creation, as well as any number of other results of his activity. However, they are goals that find their meaning in the fact that they bring about glory for God…or in other words, the display and delight in God’s glory. When salvation occurs, the Church is formed, the Kingdom comes, or Creation is redemed, we see experience and enjoy the character of God. The classic example of this is in Ephesians 1, where Paul says that God “predestined us for adoption through Jesus Christ, according to the purpose of his will, to the praise of his glorious grace.”7 For what purpose did God “predestine us for adoption?” So that in doing so, his grace might be put on display for the sake of delighting in it. This could be repeated over througout the Scriptures.8 Basically, all of the other ends which God pursues are derivative and subordinate to his pursuit of his glory…That would be one way of responding to alternative proposals for the ultimate purpose in reality.

However, that response makes it sound like salvation, the Kingdom, etc. are not very important to God. To say they are subordinate gives the impression that God is not all that excited about them, which we know is not true. Instead, I would want to say that salvation, the Kingdom, and re-creation are all central expressions of the character of God and therefore crucial to God’s purposes in the world. I would rather elevate God’s passion for his glory by saying that the reason God saves, establishes the Kingdom and re-creates is because they are an expression of his character. Again, it helps so much if we have a firm understanding of the world “glory” as an expression of God’s character. If we can see God’s pursuit of his glory as an overflowing of his life within the Trinity, we will avoid many of the misperceptions of this doctrine.

Displaying and Delighting in God’s Character in Ministry

My goal in what will follow in this philosophy of ministry is to examine how the expression and enjoyment of the inner life of the Trinity can be cultivated. This is my central passion and my life goal. God is so amazing and wonderful and such an overflowing source of life and joy that I cannot help but dedicate my existence to joining him in the pursuit of his glory.


1See The Athanasian Creed. See also Stanley Grenz, “The Trinue God,” Theology for the Community of God (Nashville: Broadman & Holman, 1994), 68-99. As well as Wayne Grudem, “God in Three Persons,” Systematic Theology (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 1994), 226-261.2Westminister Confession of Faith, Chapter 23 Wayne Grudem, Systematic Theology,218.

4For an in depth discussion of this, see John Piper, The Pleasures of God. A more challenging treatment of this same topic is Jonathan Edward’s The End for Which God Created the World. An excellent annotated version of this is available in John Piper, God’s Passion for His Glory. Piper’s footnotes make Edward’s work much more readable.

5The Westminster Larger Catechism

6 Stanley Grenz, Theology for the Community of God, 635-637.

7 Ephesians 1:5-6 (ESV)

8 For more Biblical demonstrations of God’s pursuit of his glory in all his actions, see Sam Storms on God’s Glory. I would post more of these verses here, but Storms does such a good job that I don’t really need to fill more space.

Categories: Philosophy of Ministry

How to Understand My Philosophy of Ministry Paper

March 23, 2005 · 12 Comments

This is my philosophy of ministry paper that I wrote for a class last semester. The assignment was to use the Frankena model to systematically develop a ministry philosophy that was consistent and unified. The Frankena model, which I have found to be helpful, is a tool to help analyze describe philosophies of education. Here’s what it looks like:

Frankena's Boxes

The Frankena model starts with the Box A: Ultimate Ends of education, or in this case ministry. Why do we do ministry, ultimately? What is the point? What is the goal? What is the purpose? For Christians, this boils down to just a few options, the top three condenders usually being bring glory of God, saving souls, or the establishing the Kingdom…or some combinations of those.

Box B: The Nature of Reality is by far the largest box. It includes theology, the nature of persons, epistemology (theories of what it means to know something and how you come to know it), doctrines of sin and salvation. It also includes present culture and context for ministry. Box A and B are closely related because the answers you give for one usually change the answers you give for the other.

Box A and B feed directly (or at least in a strong philosophy of ministry or education) into Box C: Educational Goals (Virtues). These are the character traits and attributes that are desired for those being educated. It describes the kinds of people you seek to form through your education or ministry. The hope is that by making these kinds of people, Box A will be more readily accomplished. For many philosophies of ministry, this box is usually concerned with the traits of individuals, but in mine, I tweak the normal use of this box in a more community-oriented direction, as you will see. I am more concerned about the virtues held by the community and the culture, rather than mere individuals.

Box D: Educational Means takes into account the nature of reality (including the nature of persons, epistemology, and present culture) and attempts to develop means by which the goals of Box C can be accomplished. How do you get a certain type of person that is described in Box C? You follow the methods laid out in Box D. Far too often ministries give no consideration of Box A or B, a shallow description in Box C, and spend all their time on Box D. In doing so, they end up with a lot of things to do, but no reason behind why they do them. (i.e. the youth group that does it just because kids like it or “it’ll be cool” or “that’s what all the big churches are doing”). The more tightly connected this box is with the previous three boxes, the stronger the ministry is likely to be.

Box E: Actual Practices describes the specific ways in which Box D is played out in a particular place and time. Box D is generalized enough that in can be applied fairly widely (so long as Box B is accurate, especially the cultural description). The goal, of course, is that by developing a well thought out philosophy of ministry, your actual practices will be well in line with your methods, goals, the nature of reality, and your ultimate purpose.

Here is my first attempt at a philosophy of ministry. I’m happy with it, but I will be developing it a lot more in the future, expanding and adding parts that I could not develop due to the constraints of the assignment. Let me know what you think and where I need improvement.

Categories: Philosophy of Ministry

Evangelism in the Book of Acts

March 22, 2005 · 1 Comment

I will be posting my philosophy of ministry paper soon, but until I have time to prepare that, I thought I would post another paper I wrote this fall. I was taking a class titled, “Jesus and Evangelism.” I did not enjoy the class tremendously, but the final paper turned out be very cool. We were asked to read the book of Acts, and without consulting commentaries, to extract a “Biblical Model of Evangelism.” First we were supposed to observe who did evangelism (this is very short in my paper), and then we were to look at how it was done. Our professor wanted us to use the filter of four froms of evangelism that he saw in the Bible:

Presence Evangelism - Also known as lifestyle evangelism. This is when someone simply lives differently in the presence of non-Christians, and the non-Christian is attracted to Christ through that example.

Proclamation Evangelism - This is good ole’ fashion gospel preaching. It is basically Billy Graham style ministry, in which the Gospel is simply declared for people to respond to.

Pursuasion Evangelism - This is the use of rational apologetics to pursuade someone to believe. It is the use of argument, reason, and debate to convince the mind that belief in Christ is good.

Power Evangelism - This is the use of miracles and wonders to draw people to faith in Jesus.

My prof was definately setting us up to find his “Biblical Model of Evangelism” in the book of Acts, because we had to use his categories, but they did help filter my thoughts a bit. Eventually, I added my own fifth mode of evangelism, which you can read about in my paper. At the same time as extracting these examples, we were supposed to asses the contemporary church’s use of these forms of evangelism (drawing from our own experiences primarily).

I have removed the intro and conclusion, because they stunk. But, hopefully, you can handle that and get something out of the rest.

Here is my paper. Personally, I don’t think it was my most well written paper (partially because of space constraints by the prof and lack of time and effort on my part), but I thought the ideas were helpful for me to think about. Let me know what you think.


Who Does Evangelism?In the book of Acts, salvation is always the work of the Lord, but he uses human agents to bring it about. The Apostles are the most common agents of evangelism, Peter and Paul being primary. Steven and Philip, who are not apostles, but two of the seven chosen to minister to the Hellenistic Jews, are also frequently witnesses. The Apostles often take partners along with them for ministry including, Barnabas, Silas, Timothy, and others. It would also be appropriate to say that the entire community of believers as a whole is an agent of evangelism, because they represent the life of God to those around them.

Presence Evangelism

Presence evangelism is when a person becomes an example to show the difference in the lifestyle of one who follows Jesus. It is often given the term lifestyle evangelism. The power of this form of evangelism is that it embodies the principles of the Gospel in a tangible way for people to see in the life of a believer. Looking at the examples of this form of evangelism in the book of Acts, we can draw out two key principles for the use presence evangelism.

First, for presence evangelism to be effective, the Christian community must be visibly involved in public life. In a sense, the life of the Christian community must be on display for the world to see. The Church cannot be a separatist group. Although they live differently from the world around them, Christians must not be isolated from the world. Faith is not a matter of private conviction, to be kept semi-secret, but a matter of public activity.

This can be seen in the behavior of the Church in the book of Acts. The unique communal life of the Church is described in Acts 2:42-47. Their community and their love was something they shared with each other, but because “day by day” they were “attending the temple together,”(Acts 2:46) the difference in their lifestyle was visible. As a result, they had “favor with all the people” and conversions were happening daily. (Acts 2:47) All throughout the book, we see the Apostles and the believers involved in Temple life. (Acts 3:1, 5:12) The temple was not merely a forum for their preaching, but a stage for their living. People could see their worship and their love, and discern the difference.

Secondly, presence evangelism is best occurs as the “new commandment” is being fulfilled. At the Last Supper, Jesus told his disciples:

“A new commandment I give to you, that you love one another: just as I have loved you, you also are to love one another. By this all people will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.” (John 13:34-35)

It is when the Church is fulfilling this commandment that presence evangelism happens in the book of Acts. As much as any action directed outside the Christian community, the love between believers demonstrates the reality of the Gospel. The sharing of possessions, (Acts 2:44) the meeting of physical needs within the community, (Acts 2:45) the hospitality, and sharing of meals, (Acts 2:46) are all acts of love that happen within the Church, but they issue in “the Lord [adding] to their number day by day those who were being saved.” (Acts 2:47) The best example of this is when the Church realizes that there are needs within the community that are not being met, particularly among the Hellenistic Jews. (Acts 6:1-7) To respond to this, the Apostles appoint seven men to focus specifically on meeting these needs. The result of this act of love among believers? “The word of God continued to increase, and the number of the disciples multiplied greatly in Jerusalem, and a great many of the priests became obedient to the faith.”(Acts 6:7)

How is the Church doing today in effectively using presence evangelism? I think we have the capacity to do very well with this form of evangelism, however I think two mistakes can creep in subtly and weaken our effectiveness in this area. First, we can easily become isolationists. There is a very distinct Christian sub-culture in America, especially in suburban Protestantism. While, not all of this is detrimental, it can easily become a way of Christians living in a bubble, interacting with only Christians, while at the same time presenting a false image of Christian lifestyle to the outside world. Especially, when the image is one of shallow optimism1 and a cheery front of moral superiority, the rich love that exists in the Christian community is obscured to those on the outside. Second, our contemporary attempts at presence evangelism often become an individualized effort. People attempt to do lifestyle evangelism by showing that their individual life is in some way superior to the life of unsaved individuals. It is the life of the believing community that needs to be on display for unbelievers. It is our love that will demonstrate the Gospel, and that can only exist in community. Let us open our community to be seen by those outside. Our flaws will be harder to hide, but the grace of God among us will be all the more compelling.

Proclamation and Persuasion Evangelism

Proclamation evangelism is the form of witness that verbally declares in public the truth of the Gospel. Persuasion evangelism is the use of logical argument to demonstrate the reasonableness of the Gospel. Although often distinct, I have paired these two forms of evangelism because in the Book of Acts most acts of persuasion occur in a proclamation setting. Both Peter and Paul use persuasion, but for the most part they within a public speech. Part of this is because the Book of Acts focuses on the public ministry of the Apostles. Very few private conversations are recorded, which makes most examples of evangelism in the book events of proclamation. With this in mind, the following principles can be seen in the proclamation and persuasion evangelism in Acts.

First proclamation and persuasion need a set up and do not happen out of the blue. Proclamation is not a cold-turkey event. On Pentecost, Peter’s speech is a response to the confusion of the visitors to Jerusalem caused by the descent of the Holy Spirit. (Acts 2:14) Peter’s speech in Solomon’s Portico happens when the attention of crowd is drawn by the healing of the lame man.(Acts 3:11-12) The apostles’ regularly have opportunities for proclamation before religious leaders because they had been arrested. (Acts 4, 7:1, 16:31-32, 21:37-40, etc.) Likewise, the use of synagogues in Paul’s missionary journey’s shows how Paul utilizes natural set-ups for proclamation. Because people come to the synagogue to hear teaching about the Torah, Paul has a perfect chance for proclamation and persuasion. (Acts 17:17) In Athens, it is the invitation of the local townspeople who love to hear new ideas that Paul has a chance to speak and reason in the Areopagus. (Acts 17:19-20) The opportunity for proclamation is always provided by logical, natural2 situations among the non-Christians of a city. The situations do not have to be created. There are natural opportunities, and the Apostles simply seize them.

Secondly, we must be context-sensitive when we use persuasion and proclamation. The mode of persuasion depends on context in which the Apostles found themselves in. Early on, when the Church is mostly in Jerusalem, Peter and the Apostles use arguments from the Scriptures frequently. They reason, but they begin with a Jewish worldview. The classic example of how this works among non-Jewish people is Paul’s address in the Areopagus. He quotes pagan philosophers, (Acts 17:27-28) outlines a more fundamental worldview, (Acts 17:24-27) and responds to the specific needs and interests of those he to whom he is speaking.(Acts 17:29) Paul speaks different languages for different contexts, and he uses different basic facts to argue from in different places. (Acts 21:37-40) Evangelistic proclamation and persuasion must be context sensitive so that it will most effectively reach people where they are at.

The contemporary Church has come through an era where proclamation evangelism, through the ministry of Billy Graham and others, has been very effective. Persuasion evangelism has also flourished on college campuses and in places with a modern rational worldview. I think the danger for us as we move out of this era is that we will not adapt our proclamation and persuasion techniques, thinking that the older forms will continue to be effective. We ought not to abandon them altogether, but we need to follow the principles of the book of Acts. We need to begin looking for natural opportunities to proclaim and persuade. Because our culture is not one where speeches are not everyday forms of communication, this may require creativity. There were ample opportunities in the Greek and Roman era for public speaking. However, in our day, speeches are not a common public event. Because of this, churches who attempt proclamation evangelism are often found creating contexts for proclamation that are unnatural. Many evangelistic events in the Church are unnatural situations for an unbelieving person to hear the Gospel. It does not make sense to come to a church revival or evangelistic rally anymore. We are not preaching to Jews who on a weekly basis gathered to hear teaching about the Bible. We are not preaching to Greeks who gathered to debate ideas in the pubic squares.

That is not to say that there are not logical and natural places for non-Christians to hear and consider religious ideas today. We are in an era of media and technology. People go to movies to hear about ideas, not lectures. They go to chat rooms and internet forums, not the town square. Perhaps we can creatively reformulate our proclamation efforts to encompass film, the internet, television, and other forms of media. As we do this, however, we need to remember to use existing contexts for proclamation. Even those churches that attempt to proclaim using media, often focus mostly on creating a Christian form of media that they hope non-Christians will use and thus encounter the Gospel. But, in the spirit of Paul in the Areopagus and synagogues, we need to go out into the places where ideas are being heard and considered already. That means going onto existing internet forums, talking to people in public coffeehouses, discussing existing movies, not simply creating our own. Expecting non-Christians to come to us to hear proclamation is silly. We must enter their context, just like Paul did. The opportunities for proclamation exist, and we just need to open our eyes to see them.

Power Evangelism

Power evangelism is the use of signs and wonders to show the power that the Holy Spirit administers through the Gospel. Paired with proclamation, this is by far the most common form of evangelism in the Book of Acts.

The main principle behind power evangelism is that signs and wonders open the door for proclamation evangelism and are fodder for persuasion evangelism. Power evangelism, like presence evangelism, is not complete. It must be accompanied by proclamation and persuasion. However, in the Book of Acts, it is very often the signs and wonders that create the opportunity for proclamation. As noted before, proclamation and persuasion need a set-up, and while there are many natural settings for this to happen, often in the Book of Acts contexts for proclamation are created supernaturally. This happens at Pentecost, when Peter preaches to the astonished crowds who had gathered because the Church was speaking in tongues.(Acts 2:1-14) The signs and wonders performed by the apostles brought “awe…upon every soul,” giving a hearing to the Gospel. (Acts 2:43) The healing of the crippled beggar draws a crowd, providing Peter an opportunity to preach. In turn this leads to the apostles’ arrest and more opportunities for proclamation. (Acts 3-4) It was because the religious leaders had seen “the man who was healed standing beside [the disciples], and they had nothing to say in opposition.”(Acts 4:14) When Paul raises Dorcas from the dead, it “became known throughout all Joppa, and many believed in the Lord.” (Acts 9:41-42) In Lystra, healing a crippled man leads to public proclamation of the Gospel. (Acts 14:8-18) When Paul and Silas are in the prison in Philippi, after a miraculous earthquake, they have a chance to share the Gospel with the jailer. (Acts 16:25-40) Over and over, miracles wrought by the Spirit lead to opportunities for proclamation. It is a tag team combination. Power evangelism draws people’s attention and drops their defenses, leaving space for the proclamation of the Gospel to find its mark. Without power evangelism, proclamation would not have happened. Without proclamation, power evangelism would have simply been a kind deed done by supernatural means.3 The two go together.

The contemporary Church has missed the mark big time on this one. Most of the Church is missing out on the power of the Spirit in evangelism. The miracle of calling and regeneration are acknowledged as works of the Spirit, but the power of God to heal bodies or perform miracles is missing for a vast majority of the Church. If miracles really do set up opportunities for evangelism, imagine what we are missing by not seeking miracles. Many would blame the lack of miracles in many Churches on theological convictions,4 but I would want to put the blame on our faith in slick marketing techniques and sales pitches to attract people to Gospel, rather than the wonder of an encounter with the Holy Spirit. We must reclaim the power of God to do miracles if we are to have the effectiveness of the early Church.

Persecution Evangelism

I would like to propose that another form of evangelism is pervasive in the Book of Acts, one that is easily ignored in contemporary American culture. One of, if not the primary vehicles for the spread of the Gospel in Acts is persecution. Persecution evangelism is the submission of believers to unjust suffering for the sake of witnessing and to embody the life, suffering and death of the Evangel himself, Jesus.

I would propose that a cyclical relationship exists between persecution and proclamation. Proclamation leads to persecution and persecution leads to proclamation. This can be seen vividly in the story of Peter and John healing the man in Solomon’s Poritico. The miracle leads to proclamation of the Gospel. Because of this proclamation, the authorities notice the apostles, leading to their arrest. (Acts 4:1-3) Proclamation results in persecution. And yet, when they are persecuted, it opens a door for them to preach to authorities. (Acts 4:7-2) Persecution opens doors for proclamation. In the same way, Paul’s preaching leads him to be stoned, (Acts 14:1-28) arrested, (Acts 16:16ff) mobbed, (Acts 19:21ff) and chased out of town. (Acts 17:1-15) The culminating example of persecution opening doors for evangelism is Paul’s arrest at the end of the book of Acts. Although it looks like a setback to the Gospel, this persecution results in Paul preaching to those gathered at the Temple, (Acts 21:37-22:21) the Council, (Acts 22:30ff) Felix, Festus, Agrippa, (Acts 25-26) and ultimately those in Rome. (Acts 28) Paul’s persecution was part of the Gospel spreading all the way to the capital of the Empire, and through his suffering, Paul gained a hearing for the Gospel in places he may have never reached otherwise.

It is sad that the contemporary Church in North America has missed this aspect of evangelism for so long. The church around the world has been experiencing the power of suffering in evangelism for a long time, but we seem to have missed it. We are far too comfortable sometimes. While we should not seek to be persecuted, and we need to pray that persecution subside for our brothers and sisters, we should not avoid suffering. Many of us act as if being at peace with society at large and well respected by the general public is a good thing for the Gospel. We fear rocking the boat or being bold enough to bring down the wrath of the establishment on us. Maybe, if we lost our fear of suffering, we might find our evangelism effective like it was in the early Church. And, perhaps, suffering is something we need to prepare for, even here in America. It may come sooner than we think. May the Kingdom prosper because of it, and the King find more subjects.


1 This is in contrast with the deep optimism of the Gospel which wrestles deeply with the reality of evil, and comes out on the other side with hope in the redemption which deals with evil in full.
2 Or supernaturally imposed, as we will see in the “Power Evangelism” section.
3 Which would have been good in itself, but as far as evangelism goes, miracles and signs do not lead to conversion all by themselves.
4 Cessationism, dispensationalism, etc.

Categories: Evangelism · Mission · Philosophy of Ministry